BIRDS IN CAPTIVITY: A BALANCED APPROACH TO THEIR KEEPING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37000/abbsl.2024.110.10Keywords:
birds; biodiversity; welfare; bioethics.Abstract
The article highlights the importance of adopting ethical and sustainable practices in the trade and keeping of poultry. The negative impact of the trade in wild birds on biodiversity and animal welfare is manifested in the high mortality rate of captured birds, as well as in the reduction of populations of wild species due to their removal from the natural environment. Full consideration of the needs of birds in their maintenance includes providing them with sufficient space for movement, socialization and physical activity, as well as ensuring proper feeding and minimizing the risks of disease. Legislative reforms aimed at banning the capture of birds from the wild and setting standards for the keeping of domestic birds could be a step towards ensuring better welfare and protection for birds. In addition, owners need to be supported and trained in the proper care of their birds so that they can provide optimal conditions for their pets. Taking into account the observations and recommendations, it can be concluded that it is important to develop and implement strategies aimed at improving the conditions of keeping and protecting domestic birds, as well as reducing the impact of the wild bird trade on wild populations.
References
Rault J.-P., Waiblinger S., Boivin X., Hemsworth P. The Power of a Positive Human–Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare. Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare. 2020. Vol. 7. P. 1-13.
Compitus K. A Brief History of the Human–Animal Bond. The Power of a Positive Human–Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare : essential Clinical Social Work Series. Springer, 2021. P. 7-14.
Browning H., Veit W. The sentience shift in animal research. The New Bioethics. 2022. Issue 4. P. 299-314.
Kidd A.H., Kidd R.M. Addendum to Problems and Benefits of Bird Ownership. Environmental Science. 1999. Vol. 84, Issue 2. P. 368-370.
Available online: URL: https://www.statista.com (дата звернення : 05.02.2024).
Broom DM. Animal welfare complementing or conflicting with other sustainability issues. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2019. Vol. 219. P. 1-5.
Malek I., Haim A., Izhaki I. Melatonin mends adverse temporal effects of bright light at night partially independent of its effect on stress responses in captive birds. Chronobiology International. 2019. Vol. 37(2). P. 189-208.
Turcu M.-C., Paștiu A., Pusta D.L. Minimally invasive sampling methods for molecular sexing of wild and companion birds. Animals. 2023. Vol. 13, Issue 3417. P. 1-10. 9. Peng S., Broom D.M. The sustainability of keeping birds as pets: should any be kept? Animals. 2021. Vol. 11, Issue 582. P. 1-14.
Romero-Vidal P., Hiraldo F., Rossetto F., Blanco G. Opportunistic or Non-Random Wildlife Crime? Attractiveness Rather Than Abundance in the Wild Leads to Selective Parrot Poaching. Diversity. 2020. Vol. 8. p. 314.
Varkey В. Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Med Princ Pract. 2021. Vol. 30, Issue 1. P. 17–28.
Thorpe R.J., Kelley J.A. Epidemiological Panel Studies of Older Adults: New Frontiers in the Research on Human– Animal Interaction. Anthrozoös. 2019. Vol. 32, Issue 2. P. 209-220.
Naito R., Chan K.M.A., Zhao J. Combating the exotic pet trade: Effects of conservation messaging on attitudes, demands, and civic intentions. Conservation Science and Practice. 2024. URL: https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13078 (дата звернення : 14.01.2024).
Biasetti P., Hildebrandt T.B., Göritz F., Hermes R., Holtze S., Stejskal J., Galli C., Pollastri I., Muzzo A., Lekolool I., Ndereeh D., Omondi P., Kariuki L., Mijele D., Mutisya S., Ngulu S., Mori B. Application of decision tools to ethical analysis in biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology. 2023. Vol., 37, Issue 2. P. 1-13.
White RL, Strubbe D., Dallimer M. et al. Assessing the ecological and societal impacts of alien parrots in Europe using a transparent and inclusive evidence-mapping scheme. NeoBiota. 2019. Vol. 48 (48). P. 45-69.
Vereda A., de las Heras M., Bartolomé B., Fernandez M., Lluch M., Cuesta J., Sastre J. Rhinoconjunctivitis and Asthma Caused by Agapornis Birds. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005. Vol. 115. Р. 28.
Kohlmeier L., Arminger G., Bartolomeycik S., Bellach B., Rehm J., M. Thamm. Pet birds as an independent risk factor for lung cancer: case-control study. BMJ. 1992. Vol. 305. P. 986-989.
Broom D.M., Fraser A.F. Domestic animal behaviour and welfare, 6th ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2021. 552 p.
Toomes А., García-Díaz P., Stringham О.С., Ross J.V., Mitchell L., Cassey Р. Drivers of the Australian native pet trade: The role of species traits, socioeconomic attributes and regulatory systemsView article page. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2022. Vol. 59, Issue 5. P. 1169-1424
Woods J.M., Eyer A., Miller L.J. Bird welfare in zoos and aquariums: general insights across industries. J. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2022. Vol. 3(2). P. 198-222.
Benichov J.I., Benezra S.E., Vallentin D., Globerson E., Long M.A., Tchernichovski O. The forebrain song system mediates predictive call timing in female and male Zebra Finches. Current Biology. 2016. Vol. 26. P. 309-318
Doneley B. Avian medicine and surgery in practice. CRC Press, 2018. 495 p.
Tully T.N., Harrison G.J. Pneumonology. In avian medicine: principles and applications. Eds.; Wingers: Lake Worth, FL, USA, 1994. P. 556–581.
Anderson J., Kaplan-Stein S., Adolph S., Peralta J.M. Assessment of non-contact infrared thermometer measurement sites in birds. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 2020. Vol. 23(2). P. 131-139.
Luescher A.U. Manual of parrot behavior. Iowa State University Press, 2006. 352 p.
Broom D.M. A method for assessing sustainability, with beef production as an example. Biological reviews. 2021. Vol. 96, Issue 5. P. 1836-1853.
Griffith S.C., Sarah B.S., Pryke R., Mariette M. Use of nest-boxes by the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata):implications for reproductive success and research. Emu. 2008. Vol. 108. P. 311–319.
Rothenberg D., Roeske T.C., Voss H.U., Naguib M., Tchernichovski O. Investigation of musicality in birdsong. Hearing Research. 2014. Vol. 308. P. 71-83.
Rose P., Riley L. The use of Qualitative Behavioural Assessment in zoo welfare measurement and animal husbandry change. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 150-161.
Jakob-Hoff R., Kingan M., Fenemore C., Schmid G., Cockrem J., Crackle A., Van Bemmel E., Connor R. & Descovich K. Potential Impact of Construction Noise on Selected Zoo Animals. Animals. 2019. Vol. 9(8). P. 1-24.
Moore B.A., Oriá A.P., Montiani-Ferreira F. Ophthalmology of Psittaciformes: parrots and relatives. Wild and Exotic Animal Ophthalmology. 2022. Vol. 1. P. 349–391. 32. Warwick C., Steedman C. Regulating pets using an objective positive list approach. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2021. Vol. 42. P. 53-63.
Berto B.P., Machado E.L., de Souza Hossotani C.M., Beretta B.M.S., da Silva D.R.R., Nakamura A.A., Meireles M.V. Integrative taxonomy for the traditional coccidians (Chromista: Miozoa: Eimeriidae) from island canaries (Aves: Passeriformes: Fringillidae): Worldwide distribution, morphological and molecular characterization, revaluations and establishment of junior synonyms. Systematic Parasitology. 2023. Vol. 100. P. 245–259.
