SHEEP WELFARE MONITORING SYSTEM IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN STANDARDS

Authors

  • Iryna Antonik
  • Kostiantyn Zaruba
  • Vitalii Nedosekov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37000/abbsl.2026.118.18

Keywords:

sheep welfare, monitoring, regulatory framework, European Union, Ukraine, comparative analysis, digital technologies, One Health.

Abstract

This article examines sheep welfare monitoring through a comparative analysis of the European Union regulatory framework and Ukraine’s evolving legal system. It draws on EU directives, regulations, scientific guidance, and strategic policy documents, alongside Ukrainian laws and subordinate acts introduced or updated in the course of harmonisation with European standards. Using comparative legal and content analysis, the study identifies the core components of welfare governance, the extent to which welfare requirements have been operationalised, and the main barriers to effective implementation.
The analysis shows that the EU has developed a more operational welfare-monitoring model based on measurable animal- and resource-based indicators, risk-based official controls, traceability, and the growing use of digital tools across production, transport, and slaughter. Ukraine, by contrast, has made substantial legislative progress, particularly through Law No. 1206-IX and Law No. 4718-IX, but important implementation gaps remain. These include the insufficient specification of sheep-relevant biological and behavioural indicators, limited uptake of digital and sensor-based monitoring, weak integration of animal identification with welfare surveillance, and underdeveloped systems of staff training and certification.
The study argues that convergence with European sheep welfare standards depends less on formal legal approximation alone than on the operationalisation of measurable welfare criteria, digital traceability, and implementation capacity. In this respect, the Ukrainian case is relevant beyond the national context for countries aligning livestock welfare governance with EU standards under conditions of agricultural transition, resource constraints, and post-war recovery

Author Biographies

Iryna Antonik

Institute of Climate Smart Agriculture of the National
Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
ORCID ID: 0009-0000-6361-7225
е-mail: primaveraryna@gmail.com

Kostiantyn Zaruba

Ascania Nova” Institute of Animal Breeding in the Steppe
Regions named after M. F. Ivanov - National Scientific
Selection-Genetics Center for Sheep Breeding
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9058-7751

Vitalii Nedosekov

National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7581-7478

References

Zufferey, R., Minnig, A., Thomann, B., Thomann, B., Zwygart, S., Keil, N., Schüpbach, G., Miserez, R., Zanolari, P. & Stucki, D. (2021). Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep. Animals, 11(10), 2973. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/10/2973?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Prykhodchenko, S. D., Prykhodchenko, O. Yu., Shevtsova, O. S. & Olishevskiy, I. H., (2025). Software detection of Ukrainian-language texts generated by AI: methods, estimations, challenges. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2025 (4), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-4/150

Veremchuk, Y. Y. (2023). Modern approaches to ensure the welfare of productive animals. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Veterinary Sciences, 25(110), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet11007

Verzhykhovsky, O., & Nedosekov, V. (2024). Key aspects of biosafety in modern animal husbandry. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 15(3), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.31548/veterinary3.2024.55

Wang, Y., Wang, X., Liu, K., Cuan, K., Hua, Z., Li, K., & Wang, K. (2025). Non-invasive monitoring for precision sheep farming: Development, hallenges, and future perspectives. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 231, 110050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.11005

Llonch, P., King, E.M., Clarke, K.A., Downes, J. M. & Green, L. E. (2015). A systematic review of animal-based indicators of sheep welfare on farm, at market and during transport. The Veterinary Journal, 206(3), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.01

Antonik, I. I., Zaruba, K. V., Danchuk, V. V., Kornik, O. V., & Nedosekov, V. (n.d.). Sheep welfare assessment system in the context of the “One Health” concept”. Collection of materials of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference, October 23-24, 2025. Odesa: ICSA NAAS, 2025. p.19-24.

Antonik, I., Blazhko, O., Nedosyekov, V., & Zaruba, K. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in the field of animal health and welfare. In Zbirnyk materialiv Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii [Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference] (Odesa, May 18, 2023, pp. 47-55).

Petkun, H. V., & Nedosekov, V. V. (2022). Analysis of EU and Ukrainian legislation for the cattle welfare. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Veterinary Sciences, 24(106), 108-113.

Petkun, H., Matryniuk, O., Melnyk, V., & Nedosekov, V. (2024). Assessing the level of knowledge of Ukrainian consumers regarding cows’ welfare on dairy farms. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 24(2).

Petkun, H., Valchuk, O., & Nedosekov, V. (2024). Selection of Parameters in the Development of a Welfare Assessing System on Dairy Farms in Ukraine. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika, 82(1), 47-54.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Antonik, I., Zaruba, K., & Nedosekov, V. (2026). SHEEP WELFARE MONITORING SYSTEM IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN STANDARDS. Agrarian Bulletin of the Black Sea Littoral, (118), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.37000/abbsl.2026.118.18